Back to Blog

Nathan Rice: Rebrand To Reveal Your Vision, Not Replace It

In his Forbes article, Energy CX President Nathan Rice argues a rebrand should reveal your company vision, not replace it—and explains why vision, not aesthetics, has to anchor the work.

Cluster of glass high-rises along Chicago's Lake Shore Drive, facades reflecting blue and gold late-day light.

Copy Link

In his latest Forbes article, President of Energy CX, Nathan Rice, shares his thoughts on how companies should approach a rebrand. As industries shift and technology advances, businesses feel real pressure to modernize their look. But a rebrand built around aesthetics alone can cost a company far more than it gains. 

Rice writes from experience. Energy CX recently went through its own rebrand after the business model evolved. As he puts it, "Our strategy became rooted in technology and precision, but our website didn't reflect that." His argument is that companies have to rebrand for the right reasons, and be just as deliberate about what stays the same as what changes. At Energy CX, the family story was the piece that had to carry through. When the company launched its platform, ABEL™, it was named after Rice's great-grandfather, Abel Rice, so the family legacy stayed intact even as the business became more tech-forward.

That's the throughline of the article: use vision as the anchor. "Don't fix what isn't broken," Rice writes. "If your company vision is strong, don't lose sight of it in a rebrand; make it the guiding force." A rebrand handled as part of a larger strategy reinforces what sets a company apart and builds credibility with customers. One handled as a facelift does the opposite. As Rice puts it, "Companies that rebrand just to give themselves a facelift risk looking sharp while losing their competitive edge."

You can read the full article here.

Let's Get Started

Get a free portfolio analysis to see what your strategy is actually costing you.